![]() ![]() And that appears to be where this law is headed, now that the state attorney general has decided it won’t waste its resources defending an obviously unconstitutional law. Forcing the law off the books, however, remains the best solution. Securing an injunction is always helpful. Within two months of its passage, a federal court had issued an injunction against the obviously unconstitutional statute - one even Arizona cops felt wasn’t worth defending. So, of course, the new law was immediately challenged in court. How this would be enforced was left to the imaginations of cops who don’t like being filmed, despite plenty of court precedent guaranteeing this First Amendment right. He signed into law a bill that prevented recording cops from any distance under 8 feet. In July of 2022, then Arizona Governor Doug Doucey decided his state’s most idiotic legislators were right: cops deserve to be protected from people that actively observe their public activities. That’s how asinine legislation becomes awful reality, even when those passing the laws should know better than to fuck with the First Amendment. It’s only cops crying “assault” because someone failed to cuff themselves, retire to the back of a cruiser, and throw the book at themselves while booking themselves in at the local jail.)Įlected idiots seem to believe people with an obscene amount of discretionary power should be even more protected from the people they serve. ![]() (Has anyone ever been booked for assaulting a fireman/EMT? Yeah, I thought not. Another subset of laws increases legal penalties for interfering with/assaulting “first responders,” even though it’s only cops that experience this sort of repercussive friction when doing their jobs. Cops who claim to have been “assaulted” by someone whose rights they’ve violated can often avail themselves of “victims’ rights” laws to keep their names from being made public. ![]() They add years to sentences if the crime victim is a cop. “Blue Lives” laws insist cops’ lives are worth more than anyone else’s lives. Because many private schools have policies that are illegal in public schools, Mayes and her office encourage families to know their rights before leaving the public school system.Because cops are the frailest of creatures and are actively harmed by people, you know, looking at them, legislators have made sure they’re ultra-protected by enacting super shitty laws that elevate cops above the people they serve. The attorney general’s office also reminds people that the FAPE, which protects education access to students with disabilities, and FERPA, which makes sure families can access school records, aren’t applicable in private schools.Īny school that accepts ESA funds is “not required to alter its creed, practices, admissions policy, or curriculum,” as codified in state law. ![]() “Families should not be denied admission or kicked out of private schools because of a child’s disabilities,” she said in a statement. Mayes says she and her office wants to make sure families and their children are not discriminated against. Except in special situations, ESA students cannot be enrolled in a public school, according to the Arizona Department of Education. Vouchers can be used to pay for private school, homeschooling, tutoring, and more. PHOENIX (3TV/CBS 5) - Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes is sounding the alarm for families who are considering using the state’s “Empower Scholarship Accounts,” also known as ESA vouchers.įamilies using ESA funds in private schools give up guaranteed and free public education for children with disabilities and the right to access their child’s educational records, Mayes said. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |